Replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda

Rwanda: Replacement-level fertility rate was 2.25 in 2010. ▼ Falling

Latest (2010)
2.25
World rank
46th
of 199 countries
All-time high
5.28
in 1990
All-time low
2.25
in 2010
Years of data
7
1950–2010

Replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda, 1950–2010

02461950198020101950: 3.41960: 3.21970: 3.11980: 2.81990: 5.32000: 2.72010: 2.2

Source: Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

Rwanda recorded 2.25 for replacement-level fertility rate in 2010. That is the lowest value across all 7 years on record.

The figure is down 16.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda peaked at 5.28 in 1990 and was at its lowest, 2.25, in 2010.

Rwanda ranks 46th of 199 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda, year by year

Annual values for Replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda, 1950 to 2010.
Year Value Change
1950 3.37
1960 3.17 -5.9%
1970 3.07 -3.2%
1980 2.81 -8.5%
1990 5.28 +87.9%
2000 2.7 -48.9%
2010 2.25 -16.7%

Rwanda compared with similar countries

  • Rwanda's 2.25 is below the median for low income countries, which is 2.39, 94% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
  • Rwanda's 2.25 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2.37, 95% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1950s 3.37 3.37 3.37 1
1960s 3.17 3.17 3.17 1
1970s 3.07 3.07 3.07 1
1980s 2.81 2.81 2.81 1
1990s 5.28 5.28 5.28 1
2000s 2.7 2.7 2.7 1
2010s 2.25 2.25 2.25 1

Countries ranked near Rwanda

  1. 44 Gabon 2.26 compare
  2. 44 South Africa 2.26 compare
  3. 46 Azerbaijan 2.25 compare
  4. 46 Botswana 2.25 compare
  5. 46 Eritrea 2.25 compare
  6. 46 Laos 2.25 compare
  7. 46 Madagascar 2.25 compare

See the full ranking of 199 places →

More population data for Rwanda

All data for Rwanda →

Frequently asked questions

What is replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda?
Replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda was 2.25 in 2010, according to Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest replacement-level fertility rate recorded in Rwanda?
The highest recorded value was 5.28 in 1990.
What is the lowest replacement-level fertility rate recorded in Rwanda?
The lowest recorded value was 2.25 in 2010.
How does Rwanda rank for replacement-level fertility rate?
Rwanda ranks 46th out of 199 countries with data for 2010.
Is replacement-level fertility rate rising or falling in Rwanda?
Over the last ten years it is down 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Rwanda data come from?
The figures come from Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Replacement-level fertility rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 7 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda. Statizoid, drawing on Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://population.statizoid.com/stat/replacement-fertility-rate/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://population.statizoid.com/stat/replacement-fertility-rate/rwanda/">Replacement-level fertility rate in Rwanda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Replacement-level fertility rate
Source
Gietel-Basten and Scherbov (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
199 places, 1,393 data points, 1950–2010
Last refreshed

The replacement-level fertility rate (the total fertility rate needed to keep the population size stable over time, without migration) is commonly stated to be 2.1. But the level can vary based on the sex ratio, child mortality rates, and other factors.